芽胞杆菌种类脂肪酸鉴定与分子鉴定方法的比较

福建农业学报 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (2): 173-180.

芽胞杆菌种类脂肪酸鉴定与分子鉴定方法的比较

刘国红^1,2, 林营志², 刘波², 林乃铨¹

1. 福建农林大学, 福建福州 350002;
2. 福建省农业科学院, 福建福州 350003

收稿日期:2011-11-17 修回日期:2012-02-07 出版日期:2012-02-29 发布日期:2012-02-29
通讯作者: 刘波(1957-),男,博士,研究员,主要从事生物技术及农业生物药物研究(E-mail:liubofaas@163.com); 林乃铨(1948-),男,博士,教授,主要从事害虫综合治理、生物防治和寄生蜂分类(E-mail:green48@163.com)
基金资助:
国家"948"项目子专题(2011-G25);福建省科技计划项目——省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项(2009R10037-1)

Comparison of Bacillus Species Identification Based on ITS and Fatty Acid Analysis

LIU Guo-hong^1,2, LIN Ying-zhi², LIU Bo², LIN Nai-quan¹

1. Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China;
2. Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sicences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China

Received:2011-11-17 Revised:2012-02-07 Online:2012-02-29 Published:2012-02-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于ITS序列和脂肪酸鉴定方法对从土壤中分离得到的16株芽胞杆菌进行分类研究,与分子鉴定结果相比,脂肪酸种的鉴定准确率可达到99%以上。通过生物软件SPSS和Mega分别对16株菌进行聚类分析,结果表明,脂肪酸比ITS更适合于芽胞杆菌的分类研究,根据脂肪酸成分可以将16株芽胞杆菌准确聚在一起,而ITS则不能。芽胞杆菌特征性脂肪酸为15:0ANTEISO和15:0ISO,但不同种芽胞杆菌的此类脂肪酸含量不同。对芽胞杆菌3大类菌群主要特征性脂肪酸的含量比例(15:0ISO/15:0ANTEISO)进行了分析,其中比较特殊的为蜡状芽胞杆菌类群,蜡状芽胞杆菌主要脂肪酸为15:0ISO,其次为13:0ISO,而15:0ANTEISO的含量很低,而且不是主要类型,15:0ISO/15:0ANTEISO的比值约为5.6~7.9。简单芽胞杆菌群主要脂肪酸为15:0ANTEISO和15:0ISO,15:0ISO/15:0ANTEISO比值约为1/6。巨大芽胞杆菌类群主要脂肪酸15:0ISO和15:0ANTEISO含量相近,其余脂肪酸远远低于这2种主要脂肪酸。巨大芽胞杆菌的15:0ISO/15:0ANTEISO的比值约为4/5~5/4,菌株FJAT-4500为短小芽胞杆菌,其15:0ISO/15:0 ANTEISO比值约为2。短小芽胞杆菌和巨大芽胞杆菌归为一类是因为其脂肪酸类型相近,但含量并不同。枯草芽胞杆菌群主要脂肪酸15:0ISO的含量小于15:0ANTEISO,15:0ISO/15:0ANTEISO的比值为1/3~2/3。

关键词: 芽胞杆菌, 脂肪酸类型, ITS序列, 分类

Abstract: 16 strains of Bacillus species isolated from soil were studied based on ITS sequences and fatty acids analysis. The accuracy rate of FA identification was 99%. Through biological software of SPSS and Mega cluster analysis, fatty acids were found to be better for Bacillus identification than ITS sequences. In this paper, we could make all the strains cluster together by FA, but ITS not. The major fatty acid of genus Bacillus was 15:0 ANTEISO and 15:0 ISO. The major FA ratio of three group were analyzed. Bacillus cereus group was special, its major FA was 15:0ISO,and 13:0ISO,but 15:0 ANTEISO had very lower profile. The ratio of 15:0ISO/15:0 ANTEISO in Bacillus cereus group was 5.6-7.9. The ratio of 15:0ISO/15:0 ANTEISO in Bacillus simplex group was 1/6. The ratio of 15:0ISO/15:0 ANTEISO in Bacillus megaterium was 4/5-5/4,strain FJAT-4500 was Bacillus pumilus,the ratio of15:0ISO/15:0 ANTEISO was 2. Bacillus pumilus was owed to Bacillus megaterium for similar ratio of 15:0ISO/15:0 ANTEISO, but the couple had different fatty acid profiles. The profile of 15:0ISO was lower than 15:0 ANTEISO in Bacillus subtilis group, and ratio was 1/3-2/3.

Key words: Bacillus species, fatty acid, ITS, classification and identification

中图分类号:

S 476

刘国红, 林营志, 刘波, 林乃铨. 芽胞杆菌种类脂肪酸鉴定与分子鉴定方法的比较[J]. 福建农业学报, 2012, (2): 173-180.

LIU Guo-hong, LIN Ying-zhi, LIU Bo, LIN Nai-quan. Comparison of Bacillus Species Identification Based on ITS and Fatty Acid Analysis[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, (2): 173-180.

参考文献

[1] PRIEST F G, GOODFELLOW M, TODD C. A numerical classification of the genus Bacillus[J]. J Gen Microbiol, 1988, 134:1847-1882.

[2] ASH C, FARROW A E, WALLBANKS S, et al.Phylogenetic heterogeneity of the genus Bacillus revealed by comparative analysis of small-subunit-ribosomal RNA sequences[J].Lett Appl Microbio, 1991, 13:202-206.

[3] XU D, CTE J C.Phylogenetic relationships between Bacillus species and related genera inferred from comparison of 3' end 16S rDNA and 5' end 16S-23S ITS nucleotide sequences[J]. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 2003, 53:695-704.

[4] HEYRMAN J, MERGAERT J, DENYS R,et al. The use of fatty acid methyl ester analysis (FAME) for the identification of heterotrophic bacteria present on three mural paintings showing severe damage by microorganisms[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 1999, 181(1): 55-62.

[5] JOHANNES S, EVELYNE B, REINER M,et al.The temperature-adaptive fatty acid content in Bacillus simplex strains from Evolution Canyon', Israel[J]. Microbiology,2008, 154:2416-2426.

[6] ALEXANDRA D, ANTÓNIO V, NOBRE F,et al.Useful-ness of fatty acid composition for differentiation of Legionella species[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1999, 37(7):2248-2254.

[7] 王秋红, 陈亮, 林营志,等.福建省青枯雷尔氏菌脂肪酸多态性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(8):1675-1687.

[8] Sherlock Microbial Identification System, Version 6.0, MIS Operating Mannual[M]. Newark, DE:MIDI, Inc., 2002.

[9] THOMPSON J D, GIBSON T J, PLEWNIAK F,et al.The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools[J].Nucleic Acids Res, 1997, 25:4876-4882.

[10] TAMURA K, DUKLEY J, NDI M,et al.MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2007, 24, 1596-1599.

[11] TAMURA K, NEI M,KUMAR S.Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 2004, 101:11030-11035.

[12] 布坎南 R E, 吉本斯 N E. 伯杰氏细菌系统学鉴定手册[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1984.

[13] 郑雪松, 杨虹, 李道棠,等. 基因间隔序列(ITS)在细菌分类鉴定和种群分析中的应用[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(6):678-684.

[14] 辛玉华, 东秀珠, 吴明强. ITS序列同源性在苏云金芽孢杆菌分型中的应用研究[J]. 微生物学通报, 2000, 27(3):178-181.

[15] 吴愉萍, 徐建明, 汪海珍, 等. Sherlock MIS系统应用于土壤细菌鉴定的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(4):642-647.

[16] 邝玉斌, 方呈祥, 张珞珍,等. 芽胞杆菌模式菌株细胞脂肪酸组分的气相色谱分析[J]. 分析科学学报, 2000, 16(4):270-273.

[17] 刘志辉, 蔡杏姗, 竺澎波,等. 应用气相色谱技术分析全细胞脂肪酸快速鉴定分枝杆菌[J]. 中国结核和呼吸杂志, 2005, 28(6):403-406.

[18] 秦巧玲, 粟婉媛, 吕均,等. GC-MS联用分析测定志贺菌全细胞脂肪酸组成[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2008, 18(3):426-428.